My theory on this (not much of one) is:
Leftists want tons of change, and typically changes that have never been implemented (or at least, successfully) - due to the nature of “potential” things to agree on, there’s too much. No unity.
Rightoids tend to prefer traditions, and those are fewer and easier to unite on because…that’s what traditions ARE.
Seems simple enough to me.
Honestly, I don’t see prostitution going that well in a communist country. Anything state mandated would take forever to go around, disease would be spread, and it would essentially be legal rape.
Yes, comrade. The Party decided that you are the best candidate to catgirl operation. Now get into a lab and have your state mandated gene modification.
No sweaty, state mandated ~~morbidly obese~~ big girls is the solution, if you have sex with anyone else then you’re fat-phobic and racist white supremacist 💅🏾🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
I remember I saw a 50 guy cream pie gangbang where it was a bunch of dudes in white T-shirts jackin’ it, and a white dude and black dude started fighting and getting in each other’s faces about who was next in line while still jerking their cocks. And the black guy slapped the white dude across the face and then grabbed his shirt and ran him into a wall and they both started punching each other, while still holding onto their cocks. It was the oddest shit I’d ever see in a porno.
Edit: I better not get my AuthRight credentials revoked for this… But I saw it on Efukt; I don't recall the exact link but I’m certain they still have it.
Nobody believes in science when it goes against their agenda. The left is just better at weaponizing science nowadays. Not at all unlike authcenters in the 1930s.
That's literally in the Bible, "go forth and multiply" and all that shit. The issue anyone with a brain has it's all the degenerate promiscuity and lack of responsibility people have in relationships these days. Like even if you fuck everyone in the country you still have the moral obligation to cater to their feelings and have a decent human connection to them, otherwise you're just a whore (no disrespect to the whores).
We've all seen what a few million angry Germans can do in 10 years. Imagine what hundreds of millions of angry Germans with their little tech devices and machines rising up once more could do.
Holy fuck I remember this, I saw it on some porn bloopers.
There was even an old Jewish feller and when he did his business the girl went “that one was kind of stinky” and in the exact voice you’d think he goes “that’s from the gifelta fish!”
It was like a sexual anti-Semitic parody and then those two dudes started fighting, lol.
I remember the end, some other dude wanted to fight the white guy and he walked out to fight but then just walked away down the street. Probably realized the levels of absurdity he was partaking in and just got the fuck out.
Fun fact: This argument is so old Marx personally addressed it in the Manifesto
>But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.
The bourgeois sees his wife as a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.
He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.
For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.
Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private
Edit: TL:DR: Women are not property to be held in common, and you are all already cucks anyway.
It’s a common thing for lefties theorists. Kropotikn, for example, wrote that humans are naturally good and altruistic. Capitalism and the state are the source of all evil. So you just need to dissolve both of them.
And such delusional idealism exists in most leftist theory. Can’t just accept that some people are simply evil.
Yes. This isn't even an uncommon stance taken by modern-day leftists.
The projection, dehumanization, and strawmanning of opponents, is as ever-present as ever as well, and a claim such as "the bourgeois" seeing their loved ones as "mere instruments of production" could just as well be uttered by any modern-day Marxist, with a few minor changes in choice of words.
When you look at this as an empathetic and reasoning individual, this is one of those excerpts that really make you question how anyone could ever take this clearly delusional individual serious.
Yeah, IMO Marx was really pulling arguments from his ass XD He also wrote “On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain.” which is just a really weird statement to make?
But I checked out Das Kapital and it’s nothing like the manifesto, it’s just a dude analyzing economics.
u/onlykhlavkalash99 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: https://basedcount.com/u/onlykhlavkalash99
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
As someone who was more libright in my younger days - no quadrant has more infighting and retardation than the yellow one.
If you literally breathe anything systematic some anime-profile is going to call you a socialist
Main difference is that auth- or right-leaning quadrants tend to be more willing to accept temporary alliances. There's plenty of librights out there who are perfectly willing to set aside their hatred of the state in order to support authright lowering taxes, while quite a few on the left would not want to ally with someone they deem liberal even to achieve a shared goal.
I actually totally disagree. The reason the left is effective is that they're much better at fighting a common enemy than the right is. When someone gets branded as the bad guy, you all fall in line quite nicely against them. The left might bicker at each other, but Orange Man Bad was a huge uniting force. So is Jordan Peterson Bad for that matter; the bad guy doesn't even need to be a direct political opponent.
I don't think you're wrong in this instance though.
Prohibition doesn't work. It just creates illegal alternatives that are more dangerous.
This is true for everything. Alcohol. Drugs. Guns. Hookers.
Even feminists can't agreed whether prostitution and porn is actually dignified towards women or not.
Even Amsterdam's Red Light District has [lots of exploitation](https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/appalling-truth-about-amsterdams-red-light-district/A4RMWQUM5RWIAY6RNDHKRWJAQ4/). Legalizing prostitution is also basically opens sex to the logic of capitalism and market forces and economics and all that jazz. Of course anything that screams more efficiency would be used. If you want to make prostitution as a business you WILL do anything that screams efficiency. This is good when you do stuff like manufacturing stuff or providing services in terms of say, expertise. But sex is intimate, which means your intimacy will also be used for profit.
Porn? See how many porn stars die young. Those who are dying young are also mostly women.
See how porn addiction and model addiction creates sex entitlement, simps, incels and see how high the female suicide rate spike up when iPhone was introduced.
Oh, someone would think of that. It's technically legal under harm-principle-oriented liberalism (Millean). It's indignified but it's still legal because it's consensual.
"Why we have to slowly convince others to be willing to prostitute themselves? We should basically use these people imported from somewhere, it's cheaper".
"This cocksucker is having too much standards and demands. We need to do something so that she accepts absolute scum of a man".
"TIRED? YOUR VAGINAS WENT CHAFING AND CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE? WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS, AM I YOUR FUCKING HUSBAND WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO GIVE YOU LOVE AND CARE? FUCK NO, CUMSLUT. YOUR 10 SECOND BREAK IS OVER, NOW GIMME ME MONEH AND SERVICE THIS OGRE NO 69420 WHO HATES HIS WIFE AND DEFINITELY WILL TAKE HIS FRUSTRATION TO YOU"
> This cocksucker is having too much standards and demands. We need to do something so that she accepts absolute scum of a man
This is literally her job though. Prostitutes are supposed to cater to the undesirable and extremely horny, if they want some chad just go out dating, bruh.
Even with legalization that's how it will work. I already provide the link on Amsterdam's Red Light District.
Even porn industry now is already like that despite being legal.
Transactional view on sex also equals transactional view on life itself and disregard of dignity (because sex is private, and except if you want rapist and exploiter run galore, you have to see your partner as not mere disposable thing).
What would you propose, then? Its... human nature, *monkeys* will start hooking if you introduce money.
It seems that making it illegal doesn't work, and making it legal... doesn't work.
>Even feminists can't agreed whether prostitution and porn is actually dignified towards women or not.
The answer is obviously no, LMAO. Anyone who says otherwise is deluding themselves.
There's a reason why anyone with sense would be so ashamed if a person they knew got in contact with this underground industry. There's some industries that you avoid at all costs if you want to remain clean and safe. Cartel activity, prostitution, porn, drug sales, and other types of human trafficking/smuggling. There's too much crime and risks involved, and you don't produce happy people by allowing it.
Well, there's plenty room for arguement for or against prostitution and porn, but anyone who thinks it's "dignified" is an idiot. It's a lesser evil at best.
Always put additional duties in job description. Also it's an easy way to fire someone with cause. If you have a terrible employee tell them you want sex. If they refuse you now have cause to fire so no unemployment.
I get what you're saying I just don't fully agree. There are people who definitely make a lot of decisions that you could argue are in a way about getting sex but this is too simplistic. There's also a lot of people and I'd say more at least at by a certain age that could give 2 shits really about making decisions like this. Plus I'd add that prostitution really isn't hidden at all now and hasn't been for a long time. Massage parlors, nudie bars, porn shops, and barely disguised personal ads have all been things for a long time.
I’m of the personal belief that when you’re with your SO, being super slutty is A-okay, but you should be modest in public. This applies to both sexes.
thee receiveth extra social credit if 't be true thee alas a state official
***
^(I am a bot and I swapp'd some of thy words with Shakespeare words.)
Commands: `!ShakespeareInsult`, `!fordo`, `!optout`
I propose a government/economy based on and backed entirely by sex work. The government is populated entirely by sex workers. If you want to have a say in the government, you just join a local, state, or federal brothel. Anytime the government wants to put money into the economy, they issue Fuck Bucks. They can use them to pay for new roads, a tank, educational services, and let the Fuck Bucks make their way through the economy like any other currency, but inevitably, any Fuck Bucks can be cashed in at a government brothel to have sex with one of the decision making prostitutes. No more taxes, no more voting on paper. You want to make policy decisions? Put your ass on the line.
True authleft would be both for and against it because our body is a mean of production and we are a worker so we detain the means of production which is good but it also makes you a bourgeois scum that capitalize on others by selling a service ( True marxists considers people like plumbers or bakers to be bourgeois) so...
Left unity is a myth invented by authleft to convince libleft to compromise until they don't hold enough power to defend themselves.
The only truly unifying factor for the left is the idea that under our current status quo, we're kind of fucked.
Small number of professional prostitutes, considered full workers, sex with them is one of optional benefits for individuals exciding the planed output.
No, I never read a single page of leftist theory.
Lmao. The answer is it didn’t.
I feel like it worked fine for certain individuals.
No longer feelin' blue?
Nope I'm singing in the rain. What a glorious feeling I'm having today.
It's a good day for [rain](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqUR3KtWbTk).
Yeah I wish it was raining it's stinking 29oC.
Im hungry can you grill for us
The cleansing fire turns the parasites into protein.
I’ll take that as a yes, when will lunch be ready
Four hours ago.
[удалено]
You beat me to it
[The answer is people confuse liberals with actual communists](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9pgKHuWQAMjCbQ.jpg)
Ya but actually commies loved sex work. The ussr used hot female spies to get info, sleep with officials, and black mail
What is this the US house of congressmen?
Nah USSR didn’t into *real* real communism bruh
Bro I near bout joined the NRA when I saw the bab00bshka spy the Russians put in there
Can’t blame you for being tempted, but fuck the NSA
Especially for those forced into it by the butt of a gun
There is literally nothing that doesn’t cause left wing infighting. We can’t even agree as what actually counts as ‘the left’!
Two leftists meet, three new parties form :)
Unfortunate but true
My theory on this (not much of one) is: Leftists want tons of change, and typically changes that have never been implemented (or at least, successfully) - due to the nature of “potential” things to agree on, there’s too much. No unity. Rightoids tend to prefer traditions, and those are fewer and easier to unite on because…that’s what traditions ARE. Seems simple enough to me.
I agree.
Left is when stupid
Based
and evil, degenerate, hateful, narcissistic, selfish, dishonest, disgusting, criminal, irrational, corrupt, racist, sexist, barbarian, murderous, unnatural, satanic, perverted. Feel free to add to this list.
no u
Lmao got'em
^(sorry)
^(it ok, u probably meant to describe me, not ursefl <3)
> Feel free to add to this list. And when no potato.
Based
Based
Judean People's Front vs. People's Front of Judea.
Anticapitalist = left. Liberals can suck a dick.
Agreed. But not all in the ‘left’ would agree with that
There is a reason Francisco Franco won the Spanish civil war
commisnms
State mandated cat girls when? Asking for a friend
The day we get state mandated cat girls is the day i flair authleft
Look up what they do in Holland. Literally state subsidised prostitutes for the handicapped
Is fuckugly a handicap?
Depends on cause. Bad hygiene and poor clothing is *not* a handicap.
> Bad hygiene and poor clothing is not a handicap. I disagree with you there. It most assuredly handicaps people.
But it's a choice, generally handicaps are something out of your control
Me whoolieing my motorcycle into an orphanage at 75 mph was definitely a choice.
Based and a block of cobblestone pilled.
That's everyone in this sub.
There was a Reddit post like that a while ago, I remember. As far as I can recall the comments called it out as bullshit
I will pay 90% income tax if we get state mandated cat girls.
Come, comrade, we cant build such a future if we dont stand together now!
Today is Tuesday, comrade. It is your time to be a catgirl. Hurry up. The Proletariat is waiting.
Honestly, I don’t see prostitution going that well in a communist country. Anything state mandated would take forever to go around, disease would be spread, and it would essentially be legal rape.
Shut up and put on the ears
It is not a prostitution if no one paying you.
you get paid in bread, the line is right over there.
Its because commies don't know math
We didn't say catgirl *cosplay*. Get the communist genetic scientists in the lab right now!
Yes, comrade. The Party decided that you are the best candidate to catgirl operation. Now get into a lab and have your state mandated gene modification.
Here is your state provided [catgirl.](https://images.ua.prom.st/1119510625_w640_h640_kostyum-koshka-karamelka.jpg), bro.
Leave it to the government to do it wrong
I was expecting something more cursed than that
It's me, he's asking for me. I'm his friend.
They would of been free if the Area 51 invasion succeeded and we found the government’s stash.
No sweaty, state mandated ~~morbidly obese~~ big girls is the solution, if you have sex with anyone else then you’re fat-phobic and racist white supremacist 💅🏾🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
I will be your friend.
I remember I saw a 50 guy cream pie gangbang where it was a bunch of dudes in white T-shirts jackin’ it, and a white dude and black dude started fighting and getting in each other’s faces about who was next in line while still jerking their cocks. And the black guy slapped the white dude across the face and then grabbed his shirt and ran him into a wall and they both started punching each other, while still holding onto their cocks. It was the oddest shit I’d ever see in a porno. Edit: I better not get my AuthRight credentials revoked for this… But I saw it on Efukt; I don't recall the exact link but I’m certain they still have it.
I kinda need to see this now
Yeah we need a link ... for *something other than* science!
Wait a minute… AuthRight doesn’t believe in science. LibLeft, is that you in disguise again?
Libleft psyop strikes again
Right, I made an edit
Wait a minute… AuthRight isn’t openly into gay porn! Change your flair blasphemer!
No no, it checks out. There can still be one woman in a 50 guy cream pie gangbang.
I honestly didn't even think about the possibility that it was gay porn lol
Nobody believes in science when it goes against their agenda. The left is just better at weaponizing science nowadays. Not at all unlike authcenters in the 1930s.
Nazis are actually dislike religious ethics regarding sex. They actually want people to multiply like rats so that there will be more people.
That's literally in the Bible, "go forth and multiply" and all that shit. The issue anyone with a brain has it's all the degenerate promiscuity and lack of responsibility people have in relationships these days. Like even if you fuck everyone in the country you still have the moral obligation to cater to their feelings and have a decent human connection to them, otherwise you're just a whore (no disrespect to the whores).
We've all seen what a few million angry Germans can do in 10 years. Imagine what hundreds of millions of angry Germans with their little tech devices and machines rising up once more could do.
I saw it on Efukt; I don't recall the exact link but they should still have it.
you want to see 50 dudes jerking their cocks?
No, I wanna see 2 dudes fight while they're jerking off with 48 other dudes
Im not proud, but i really need to see this
you have been ejected from authright
Holy fuck I remember this, I saw it on some porn bloopers. There was even an old Jewish feller and when he did his business the girl went “that one was kind of stinky” and in the exact voice you’d think he goes “that’s from the gifelta fish!” It was like a sexual anti-Semitic parody and then those two dudes started fighting, lol. I remember the end, some other dude wanted to fight the white guy and he walked out to fight but then just walked away down the street. Probably realized the levels of absurdity he was partaking in and just got the fuck out.
🤨📸
Username checks out
Efukt is a deep rabbit hole. I regret ever visiting that website.
You can't just pull something like this and not tell us where to find it
Least degenerate Auth-right
Should've used his dick to slap him
Bud go touch some grass and seek God while you're at it
I do not know whether to be fascinated or not
Sauce?
And people say porn ain't art
Wtf is Efukt?
It’s primarily porn bloopers and comedy sketches masquerading as porn. It’s an odd place, old school internet.
*Sigh* !remindme 2 days
Is your partner personal property or owned by the collective?
With OnlyFans these days, you can digitally Rent-A-Bitch.
With a socialist government, if can't get/afford one, the government will provide one for you 😎🥂
Yeah, the government would provide free onlyfans but only of Nikocado Avocado’s account
Based and fast food pilled
The real left-right divide
Fun fact: This argument is so old Marx personally addressed it in the Manifesto >But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus. The bourgeois sees his wife as a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women. He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production. For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial. Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives. Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private Edit: TL:DR: Women are not property to be held in common, and you are all already cucks anyway.
That guy always wrote so much text and it all boils down to: "Trust me bro, it will simply "lead to abolition" of x"
Based and Marx should learn to write pilled
Originator of the lefty text meme???
I read the manifesto and this quote always pisses me off so much. Like did that retard seriously think ‘sexism is because capitalism’?? 🙄
The more Marx I read the more I realize he had no understanding of human nature.
He just took all the bad stuff, put it on rich people, and assumed everyone else woyld be totally innocent without their influence.
It’s a common thing for lefties theorists. Kropotikn, for example, wrote that humans are naturally good and altruistic. Capitalism and the state are the source of all evil. So you just need to dissolve both of them. And such delusional idealism exists in most leftist theory. Can’t just accept that some people are simply evil.
Yes. This isn't even an uncommon stance taken by modern-day leftists. The projection, dehumanization, and strawmanning of opponents, is as ever-present as ever as well, and a claim such as "the bourgeois" seeing their loved ones as "mere instruments of production" could just as well be uttered by any modern-day Marxist, with a few minor changes in choice of words. When you look at this as an empathetic and reasoning individual, this is one of those excerpts that really make you question how anyone could ever take this clearly delusional individual serious.
Yeah, IMO Marx was really pulling arguments from his ass XD He also wrote “On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain.” which is just a really weird statement to make? But I checked out Das Kapital and it’s nothing like the manifesto, it’s just a dude analyzing economics.
Yes. And they still do.
Funny thing is most poly/open relationship are communists.
Public ownership of the means of production... Or reproduction?
Is your own body your personal property or owned by the state?
Left Unity means anarchist need to be in camps
You're supposed to at least to pretend to be nice til we've accomplished something. Then we can discuss cell conditions and so on.
As if you ever got enough support anywhere so that someone needs to see you as an equal
I hope you know me and 5 people I sometimes agree are very hurt by that.
Based and Overton window pilled
u/onlykhlavkalash99 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: https://basedcount.com/u/onlykhlavkalash99 I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
When the fuck did they let basedcount bot back in? This was a nice surprise.
*Cocks Shotgun* Always has been.
I had a 5 day ban like a month ago. Other than that, it hasn't been out for a long time.
Based
Based
Based and Honor-Scout-Camp pilled
Based, goddamn. Wreckers, every one.
Leftists fight themselves more than anyone else. That’s why they never get anything done.
As someone who was more libright in my younger days - no quadrant has more infighting and retardation than the yellow one. If you literally breathe anything systematic some anime-profile is going to call you a socialist
You think murder should be illegal? Fucking statist
You think people should have driver's Licenses? Fucking statist.
Main difference is that auth- or right-leaning quadrants tend to be more willing to accept temporary alliances. There's plenty of librights out there who are perfectly willing to set aside their hatred of the state in order to support authright lowering taxes, while quite a few on the left would not want to ally with someone they deem liberal even to achieve a shared goal.
I actually totally disagree. The reason the left is effective is that they're much better at fighting a common enemy than the right is. When someone gets branded as the bad guy, you all fall in line quite nicely against them. The left might bicker at each other, but Orange Man Bad was a huge uniting force. So is Jordan Peterson Bad for that matter; the bad guy doesn't even need to be a direct political opponent.
Bruh that could easily be Yellow and Blue as the funny colors.
It isn’t as common, and I say this as a former leftist
Hmmm, let’s see. **Prostitution is not morally wrong and should be entirely legal with no special taxes.**
i respectfully disagree with your opinion
That’s fair, I’ve been wrong a bunch in this life
I don't think you're wrong in this instance though. Prohibition doesn't work. It just creates illegal alternatives that are more dangerous. This is true for everything. Alcohol. Drugs. Guns. Hookers.
Fuck you
Pay me
Get. Dat. Doe!!!
Based
That’s good though because when they do get something done we get gulags and famines.
Even feminists can't agreed whether prostitution and porn is actually dignified towards women or not. Even Amsterdam's Red Light District has [lots of exploitation](https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/appalling-truth-about-amsterdams-red-light-district/A4RMWQUM5RWIAY6RNDHKRWJAQ4/). Legalizing prostitution is also basically opens sex to the logic of capitalism and market forces and economics and all that jazz. Of course anything that screams more efficiency would be used. If you want to make prostitution as a business you WILL do anything that screams efficiency. This is good when you do stuff like manufacturing stuff or providing services in terms of say, expertise. But sex is intimate, which means your intimacy will also be used for profit. Porn? See how many porn stars die young. Those who are dying young are also mostly women. See how porn addiction and model addiction creates sex entitlement, simps, incels and see how high the female suicide rate spike up when iPhone was introduced.
> anything that screams more efficiency would be used. So groupons for gangbangs?
Oh, someone would think of that. It's technically legal under harm-principle-oriented liberalism (Millean). It's indignified but it's still legal because it's consensual.
A Swiss style double mandate. You're obligated to buy at a regulated cost and list of services, and she can't refuse!
>Screams efficiency Is that extra
"Why we have to slowly convince others to be willing to prostitute themselves? We should basically use these people imported from somewhere, it's cheaper". "This cocksucker is having too much standards and demands. We need to do something so that she accepts absolute scum of a man". "TIRED? YOUR VAGINAS WENT CHAFING AND CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE? WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS, AM I YOUR FUCKING HUSBAND WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO GIVE YOU LOVE AND CARE? FUCK NO, CUMSLUT. YOUR 10 SECOND BREAK IS OVER, NOW GIMME ME MONEH AND SERVICE THIS OGRE NO 69420 WHO HATES HIS WIFE AND DEFINITELY WILL TAKE HIS FRUSTRATION TO YOU"
> This cocksucker is having too much standards and demands. We need to do something so that she accepts absolute scum of a man This is literally her job though. Prostitutes are supposed to cater to the undesirable and extremely horny, if they want some chad just go out dating, bruh.
Thats... literally exactly how it works now because they have no legal protection.
Even with legalization that's how it will work. I already provide the link on Amsterdam's Red Light District. Even porn industry now is already like that despite being legal. Transactional view on sex also equals transactional view on life itself and disregard of dignity (because sex is private, and except if you want rapist and exploiter run galore, you have to see your partner as not mere disposable thing).
> Transactional view on sex also equals transactional view on life itself and disregard of dignity Based and human dignity pilled.
What would you propose, then? Its... human nature, *monkeys* will start hooking if you introduce money. It seems that making it illegal doesn't work, and making it legal... doesn't work.
>Even feminists can't agreed whether prostitution and porn is actually dignified towards women or not. The answer is obviously no, LMAO. Anyone who says otherwise is deluding themselves.
There's a reason why anyone with sense would be so ashamed if a person they knew got in contact with this underground industry. There's some industries that you avoid at all costs if you want to remain clean and safe. Cartel activity, prostitution, porn, drug sales, and other types of human trafficking/smuggling. There's too much crime and risks involved, and you don't produce happy people by allowing it.
Well, there's plenty room for arguement for or against prostitution and porn, but anyone who thinks it's "dignified" is an idiot. It's a lesser evil at best.
Outside of recent liberal/intersectional feminists they've always been deeply anti prostitution
Always put additional duties in job description. Also it's an easy way to fire someone with cause. If you have a terrible employee tell them you want sex. If they refuse you now have cause to fire so no unemployment.
Why ask money for sex when you can give it for free? Problem solved
Honorably serving the community.
Just like the reds were resocializing the women in Germany when they came to save them from the evils of national socialism.
[удалено]
Based and sex-is-sacred-pilled
[удалено]
I get what you're saying I just don't fully agree. There are people who definitely make a lot of decisions that you could argue are in a way about getting sex but this is too simplistic. There's also a lot of people and I'd say more at least at by a certain age that could give 2 shits really about making decisions like this. Plus I'd add that prostitution really isn't hidden at all now and hasn't been for a long time. Massage parlors, nudie bars, porn shops, and barely disguised personal ads have all been things for a long time.
I’m of the personal belief that when you’re with your SO, being super slutty is A-okay, but you should be modest in public. This applies to both sexes.
Just wait until we get realistic sex robots and everyone stops doing everything.
Chastity belt for everyone.
The only solution.
you get extra social credit if you fuck a state official
thee receiveth extra social credit if 't be true thee alas a state official *** ^(I am a bot and I swapp'd some of thy words with Shakespeare words.) Commands: `!ShakespeareInsult`, `!fordo`, `!optout`
Works pretty much the same as now except that we will all be more poor.
You misspelled prostitution.
Sex work is a moronic euphemism for exploitation dressed up as liberation. It's downright satanic.
What? You think poor usually uneducated drug addicted women selling their dignity to make a quick buck is exploitive? Why do you hate women? /s
My country's law is a proof that sex work isn't real work. Prostitution is legal and exempt from income tax.
I propose a government/economy based on and backed entirely by sex work. The government is populated entirely by sex workers. If you want to have a say in the government, you just join a local, state, or federal brothel. Anytime the government wants to put money into the economy, they issue Fuck Bucks. They can use them to pay for new roads, a tank, educational services, and let the Fuck Bucks make their way through the economy like any other currency, but inevitably, any Fuck Bucks can be cashed in at a government brothel to have sex with one of the decision making prostitutes. No more taxes, no more voting on paper. You want to make policy decisions? Put your ass on the line.
Really getting at the fundamentals of human nature. This is the truth.
True authleft would be both for and against it because our body is a mean of production and we are a worker so we detain the means of production which is good but it also makes you a bourgeois scum that capitalize on others by selling a service ( True marxists considers people like plumbers or bakers to be bourgeois) so...
Left unity is a myth invented by authleft to convince libleft to compromise until they don't hold enough power to defend themselves. The only truly unifying factor for the left is the idea that under our current status quo, we're kind of fucked.
Small number of professional prostitutes, considered full workers, sex with them is one of optional benefits for individuals exciding the planed output. No, I never read a single page of leftist theory.
Your hooker? *Our* hooker.
*No* hooker I dare say.
The state needs to seize the means of re(production).
Sex doesn't work.
It does seem to be perpetuating the problem instead of solving it.
"There is no sex in the Soviet Union"
Answer is simple: it wouldn’t, and it would be illegal.
that's why i abandoned capitalism lol
Cuba is a heaven of cheap prostitution for 1st worlders lol
In Soviet Russia prostitutes hire you.