By - cupnoodles1675
The ideology of writing down a million responses in different replies because someone kept thinking of more and more random ideologies-ism
Eventually your brain runs out of ideological combinations.
It’s one of him vs all of us, we can take him!
Quick, sacrifice the communist or socialist based ideologies to wear him down quicker!
In this society people will eventually make new technologies and evolve.
Return to monke only to return back to society 😔✊🙊🙊🙊
If you show monke how to use currency, they become libright.
Ðey'd find out ðemselves
Not if MONKE bashes the inventors
Like… with a tool? Maybe MONKE notices heavy stick work better than light stick, and rock work better than heavy stick, and before MONKE realizes he’s got a medieval three headed flail…Does he then turn it on himself?
Based and monke pilled
But the new technologies will cause them to destroy themselves, returning them to monke.
Agrarian Anarcho-monarchism with greco-chinese characteristics
Since you didn't quite get an answer I'd say a rural country with a weak monarch just can't produce an acceptable income
Ah but it can certainly be somewhat stable enough to exist, though the greco-chinese thing confuses me (so does anarcho-monarchism but it's apparently a real ideology).
If anything, being an agrarian country where people are poor geographically-divided peasants will probably be easier to handle than well-organized city-dwellers, making it easier grounds for a weaker monarch.
Iirc in anarcho-monarchism people don't have to follow the king if they don't believe they are doing a good job, but it would be kind of easy to abuse if your people rely on your services too much (what does an monarch even does under such a system?). So my criticism would rather be, it's easy for to devolve into authoritarianism except if the monarch role is just a figure with no power or utility, in which case it becomes an unnecessary middleman and more of an aesthetic element than anything.
id think the monarch would just be a head of state for political purposes, maybe responsible for organizing generals/maintaining a volunteer militia for self defence. greco chinese characteristics would be democratic for greek and socialist for chinese. if a dispute came up it would be handled by popular vote. and have a take a penny leave a penny communal food/tool/material reserve.
but im also retarded and didnt bother looking at a wiki for anything i just said
You know, you’re the only one that got close to what I was thinking when i made up the “greco-chinese” thing, obligatory Based.
Based and I think I understand this pilled.
The immortal science of Jeffersondavis-hater Thought
His split caused more people in the south to like slavery.
I thought you were supposed to be criticizing. Did you miss the "-hater" appended at the end?
As a Son of the Union and descendent of several Blue Jacket veterans, I can tell you with absolute certainty his reply in no way rendered Jeffersondavis-hater Thought merely mortal.
You run out of wood to make more barns with.
Everyone eventually just dies
Which means it is successful
Sometimes ones own defeat is their goal xD
Task failed successfully
Can't spread your ideology when everyone is dead
Spreading is for cancer, butter, and your mom's legs.
Who says they want to? :P
No more members tho
Thats the point.
As opposed everyone eventually not dying?
It assumes that some ordinary economic concepts function under anarchy.
You eventually run out of charcoal, propane, and meat to grill.
Your ideas of grilling are narrow. Have you heard of Darth Grillis the wise?
I thought not. It’s not a story the extremists would tell you. It’s a Centrist legend. Darth Grillis was a Lord of the Centrists, so powerful and so wise he could use his grill to create food… He had such a knowledge of grilling that he could even save the ones he cared about from starving. The Centrist side of the Compass is a pathway to many cooking techniques some consider to be unnatural. He became so good at grilling that the only thing he was afraid of was losing his grill, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice stole his grill. Ironic.. he could save others from starvation, but not himself.
Based and Darth Grillis the Wise-pilled
The birth of a new copypasta?
Is it possible to learn this power?
Not from an extremist.
Hate to be THAT libright but certain companies may become too powerful due to a monopoly, particularly infrastructure ones that make the roads. Emergency response territories/standards would also become complicated if the companies don't work well together (and trust me, certain state ones already do WITHOUT having to worry about territory/standards)
Certainly one of my favorite bases, just needs a few tweaks
What's wrong with being THAT LibRight? All I see is based.
I would say education should be provided by the tax payer as well to give children equal chances or at least based on education in some manner.
Health maybe be could be a based on a middle ground of a minimum with certain things covered by taxes and others not (,which is also fairly common worldwide).
Monopolies are also certainly an issue.
So I do think this also has problems.
Any ideology has issues because problems should be often solved on a per case basus and more so updated as society changes due to the influence of progression (scientific/technological/etc).
Rules should be based on what's available and not basically, and that's why different ideologies are better in different eras.
Based and case-by-case pilled.
Who said minarchists can’t have anti trust laws
I know it’s not pure but still pretty close to pure
I'll do OP's job for them.
Good luck with your itty-bitty watchman government flanked by China and Russia.
its literally the oposite of shit. lol i bet he wont say anything
He means minarchism, he didn't misspell monarchism
Average minarchist monarchist
Least insane authright
Wtf based authright
>”minarchism is literally the opposite of shit”
We will MAKE you support a free economy
Do what you want… or else.
Nepotism eventually will corrupt even the most technocratic system. Look at neoconfucianism, it happened with them and it can happen with us.
Systems where the leaders are decided via appointment do usually end up corrupt
Evolution is something that tends to happen, it's an unavoidable process.
But what if the next step of the human evolution is monke?
Based and Monke pilled
then the cycle repeat and we evolve into crabs
We can't solve every societal problem with technological progression
Name one that can't
Ha, I've already replaced my face with a fully mechanical nuclear powered monitor with laser beams and a computer from 1982 so I can simulate how it feels to be unflaired.
The new tsar might have genetic impairment and we could do nothing about it.
We already demonstrated that we're eager to send our monarch to the front line.
When the newly crowned Tsar is Sus!! 😳😳
Independent Libertarianism (not radical)
Big corporations can become the most powerful and oppress people.
What about the same ideology but with protection against corporations
Doesn't that require government?
Like I said, not radical. Government intervention is necessary
(I’m trying to see why my exact ideology is shit lol)
Exactly. Government enforces contracts. Without a government, contracts are just pieces of paper. What is business without contracts?
Wild West, rule of the gun and complete corruption and rule of the mafia
A monarchy purely centered on the game Among Us
Thats the good part
Eventually you always run out of Bourbons.
They focus too much on the environment and can't see the bigger picture.
The status quo isn't infinite, you have to adapt and change at some point.
My last response wasn't great, but I'm a nationalist so I'm not sure how to answer this.
You can be a nationalist and respect other nations' right to exist
Schisms combined with possibility of stupid leaders and incest
You can't base an entire society on catholic social teachings, you need some changes.
Just watch me…
Economic-center Libertarian with regressive social leanings.
You can't be libertarian and expect the people to regress without any intervention whatsoever. People tend to progress as society does.
Sometimes war is needed to achieve an objective.
Nah I'm pretty sure appeasement would have worked *eventually*, funny mustache man would have gotten tired of eating countries *eventually.*
People will eventually technologically advance
I do not want to ascend
It is the unnavoidable and evolution.
P R O G R E S S
Suicide it is then
Okay South Park
South Park will eventually run out of things to make fun of
yeah, in 5 trillion years, maybe.
No Ideology is full proof, Every one is shit in its own way, forever we are doomed to repeat the cycle of New ideas vs old habits
Spooky Stirner, is that you?
Do you mean *foolproof*
I shit myself on a daily basis
Chance of retarded ruler.
Yet with Democracy, you get a whole bunch of retards, all of which cater to the passions of equally stupid electorate.
Democracy secures mediocrity
Full devotion to the state will probably be rejected by most people
your own ideology! checkmate!
My ideology is too weird to get a following.
Lay it on me daddy.
Nationalist Monarchy with capitalist or maybe corporatist systems and strong worker cooperatives to ensure things are more fair for the middle class.
That sounds like the UK or Saudi Arabia but in more words
If the Saudi royal family made a bunch of labour laws helping workers tomorrow, Saudi Arabia would be very close to OP's ideology economically at least.
Its already close even if there isnt a bunch of labour protection shit lol.
People don't naturally respect each other's individuality, also this would only work in a society where everyone was an objectivist.
Obviously not OP, but it’s just a long-winded way to say “bootlicker”
Eventually the people who come out on top will just purge the entire population and environment out of greed.
Democracy will eventually fail.
Too fat and ugly
Schizophrenia isn't an ideology even if it's based
We have canine teeth, our bodies were designed to be omnivorous.
Based and omnivorous pilled
Austrian economics - The free market has been wrong on multiple occasions.
Longism - Huey long is sadly dead, and only he could lead his movement forward.
Distributism - some people will do other things with their land other than farming and family raising.
Social libertarianism - you need a large government to put those policies in place.
Ah Huey Long, the most radical centrist
National-democracy with populist characteristics.
Islamic monarchism and Abrahamic theocracy
Islamic theocracy - People will eventually resist the sharia laws, especially human rights activists.
Abrahamic theocracy - schizms tend to happen in movements which can easily destabilize the order.
A guy called jihad enjoyer must be the taliban infiltrator. Either that or I’m racial profiling :/
flaired authright too its adding up in all the wrong ways
Killed fucktons of people.
That sounds like a positive
No matter how hard you try, you can never convert everyone.
That's what propaganda and fear are for dumb dumb
Eventually other religions and schizms will oppose the state.
Not if we kill them all
Look at this badass polsci major being a badass
Minarchism, since I didn't see it elsewhere
Police state or no state, pick one.