T O P
[deleted]

KCommand is too slow to consider a "threat", imo. You're kind of going the opposite direction there, putting in a grindy top end card instead of a fast beater. If you go with a fifth delve threat, I think you have to do a 2/3 split of Tas and Fish. You just don't have enough graveyard to go 1/4.


[deleted]

I disagree with having to go 2/3. Our plan is to stick one or two threats, it's the same idea as just having 4 anglers. Adding the extra tasigur is not so we can play more threats onto the board but to make us have less games where we just don't find a threat at all. So I've been testing 1/4 and it's been going well, just pitching that third delve threat to looting for more interaction if I can


pieguy396

Definitely agree here. Kommand and Snappy both help with the same thing, and Snappy is generally just better. It would be a mistake to cut Snappy for Kommand. Also agree with 2/3 vs 1/4.


SnapcasteRamage

Now what about a 2/2 split with a single [[Tombstalker]] as the fifth delve creature? I haven’t been on GDS as much lately, but I always wanted to add the big demon were I to put the deck back together.


pieguy396

That seems to go counter to what this build wants to do. You want to power out your threat(s) on turn 2, and Tombstalker is almost always T3 or later.